graduate school lends itself to nights like this: nights when you’re poring over 60 pages of heidegger and deciding to read only 20 pages because what does it really matter? you don’t understand much of it anyway. at least you suspect you don’t. nights when you’re struggling with an assignment to read an article written by an archaeologist who is extremely enthusiastic about the diameter of pipe stems in colonial america. nights when mtv’s “sweet sixteen” is looking a hell of a lot more tempting than your coursework.

i had a moment like this tonight as i was slogging through my material constructions reading, which is not nearly as interesting as i thought it would be. and then i came across this perfect passage, which is part of an article i actually did enjoy by gaston bachelard, from his book the poetics of space:

If we give objects the friendship they should have, we do not open a wardrobe without a slight start. Beneath its russet wood, a wardrobe is a very white almond. To open it is to experience an event of whiteness.

and i felt a little uplifted after reading this passage. because who doesn’t feel good after reading a sentence that compares a wardrobe to an almond? and suddenly i was swept up in a surge of creativity and purpose.* this surge lasted approximately five minutes. BUT. in this surge i had two revelations.

revelation #1: i think i already know, at least vaguely, the topic of my material constructions seminar paper. this is a decision i’m certainly supposed to be making this early in the semester (but yet it is a decision i rarely make before, say, mid-october). i want to write about the circulation of family heirlooms in the nineteenth century, and perhaps most pointedly heirlooms that outwardly attempt to embody family history (e.g. hair jewelry). i know nothing about this topic and therefore may be talking like i’ve been taking crazy pills, but it’s worth looking into. thank you, dr. bachelard.

revelation #2: i’ve been considering my concentration within the victorian period as maternity/childbirth/family, despite the fact that my academic advisor warned me against “defining myself as the OBGyn student” early in my years at rice. but now i’m thinking of shifting it — or broadening it, depending on your point of view — to all-female communities in the nineteenth century. it’s pretty broad, but i can probably narrow it down a little, and it seems more dissertation-friendly. almost every paper i’ve written in grad school somehow lends itself to this topic, so in a way it was my concentration already and i just didn’t realize it.

i had a third revelation that has nothing to do with grad school and everything to do with wedding cakes. but that is for another post.

*excuse the nautical metaphors. too much mrs. dalloway.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “

  1. Hey girl, this has nothing to do with your post… but I wanted to tell you I’m back from the UK. I did, indeed, go to the Fringe in Edinburgh and it was AWESOME! Saw 8 shows in 4 days, some of them for free, and there was only one that I disliked. You’ve got to go back for the festival some time.

  2. More happy reading, I see…

    Ah yes, the happiness of your “job” being to read Heidegger, Bachelard, and Woolf. Poetics of Space is one of my favorite theory books.

    A bit of friendly advice, if I may: As far as grasping Heidegger (and all 20th Century continental philosophy for that matter), I found it advantageous to go back and read Husserl’s phenomenological writings. Husserl’s most mature phenomenological ideas appeared in Cartesian Meditations, although Logical Investigations deals a good bit with language and experience, meaning and reference, etc. If you can get your mind around Husserl (and it’s a challenge without a strong background in historical philosophy, most notably Descartes and Kant), then what Heidegger and Bachelard (not to mention Derrida, Merleau-Ponty, Lyotard, etc.) are trying to do becomes clearer. You’ll be a star (and a constant tutor to peers).

    Happy reading.

    • Re: More happy reading, I see…

      i’ll add that to my reading list, but thankfully my professor gave us a brief crash course in hesserl’s phenomenology in class this afternoon. but, of course, it is nearly impossible to understand any degree of the complexity of such philosophers in a “brief crash course.”

      there is something about the name hesserl that i find impossible to type correctly…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s